Google was the first of the great companies to build this kind of distributed computing infrastructure, and kept it proprietary.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2024-09-18 against the history of computing. The quote claims only that Google was the first of the great (large tech) companies to build this kind of distributed computing infrastructure; the 'kept it proprietary' part of the proposition is context, but it is judged too. True: historical sources show Google pioneered large-scale distributed infrastructure on commodity hardware (GFS, MapReduce, Bigtable) ahead of the other major tech companies, and kept the systems internal, publishing papers rather than the software. Mostly true: Google is widely seen as the pioneer, but others had comparable systems around the same time (Yahoo, Amazon, Inktomi, Akamai), so 'first' is a slight overstatement. Mixed: Google was one of several early builders and its priority is genuinely disputed. Mostly false: other great companies clearly built such infrastructure earlier, and Google's role is overstated. False: Google clearly came after other major companies.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 The Google File System Google Research (ACM SOSP 2003 paper: Ghemawat, Gobioff, Leung) · 2003
“We have designed and implemented the Google File System, a scalable distributed file system for large distributed data-intensive applications. It provides fault tolerance while running on inexpensive commodity hardware, and it delivers high aggregate performance to a large number of clients.”
-
E2 The Google File System Google Research (ACM SOSP 2003 paper: Ghemawat, Gobioff, Leung) · 2003
“It is widely deployed within Google as the storage platform for the generation and processing of data used by our service as well as research and development efforts that require large data sets.”
-
E3 Product or Service? Internet Infrastructure's Battling Business Models strategy+business (originally published by Booz & Company) · 1 October 2000
“As part of Mr. Gauthier's master's thesis, the pair developed a technology that let clusters of workstations act in parallel, as if the multiple machines were one immense supercomputer.”
-
E4 Cluster-Based Scalable Network Services Fox, Gribble, Chawathe, Brewer, Gauthier (UC Berkeley and Inktomi Corporation); Appears in SOSP-16 · October 1997
“interconnected by a high-speed SAN are exceptionally well-suited”
Reasoning
The evidence shows Google built and deployed GFS internally by 2003 (E1, E2) and that Inktomi-linked cluster work came earlier (E3, E4). It does not show that Google kept the systems proprietary, or how Google's priority is generally seen, so it does not settle the claim under the criteria.
Cite this claim
Mark Zuckerberg, “Google was the first of the great companies to build this kind of distributed computing infrastructure, and kept it proprietary.” (said 18 September 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_cf2d0dcebede, method 0.1.0+3f84d14d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_cf2d0dcebede
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Mark Zuckerberg
-
Mostly true
“We launched the Meta Quest 3S Xbox Edition last month, and we're seeing record interest in cloud gaming.”
-
Mostly true
“This is kind of what we’ve been maxing out with Reality Labs over the last 5 to 10 years is basically doing the research on all of these different things.”
-
Mostly true
“They have longer battery life, higher resolution camera, and are designed for sports.”
-
Resolved true
“Right now we’re building ones that I think are stylish, but aren’t focused on the display.”
Meta is currently building stylish glasses that are not focused on a display.
-
Mostly true
“I think one of the protocols they’ve used that they built, they basically didn’t encrypt it, so it’s like plain text.”
Apple built a protocol for connecting accessories to the iPhone that is not encrypted (plain text).
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.