As of 2001, computational substrates are already more than ten million times faster than neural circuitry.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “As of 2001, computational substrates are already more than ten million times faster than neural circuitry.” (said January 2001). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_cef70d82fef5, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_cef70d82fef5
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mixed
“But I got to 10 billion. It started to do things.”
Kurzweil said that at about 10 billion connections neural networks started to do things.
-
Mixed
“the cloud right now is expanding exponentially. It gets twice as fast every year for the same money.”
Cloud computing is expanding exponentially, doubling in speed every year for the same money.
-
Mostly false
“a 20 quadrillion–fold increase over 80 years.”
Computation/AI capability has increased 20 quadrillion-fold over 80 years.
-
Resolved true
“It’s remarkable how long it’s lasted, but it wasn’t the first, but the fifth paradigm to provide exponential growth to computing.”
-
Mostly true
“A computer can also remember billions or even trillions of facts perfectly, while we are hard pressed to remember a handful of phone numbers.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.