Moore's Law (shrinking transistors on integrated circuits) was the fifth paradigm, not the first, to provide exponential growth in computing.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.
What would count as true or false
Claim: in Kurzweil's framework, Moore's Law (shrinking transistors on integrated circuits) is the fifth, not the first, paradigm of exponential growth in computing, preceded by four earlier paradigms. True if Kurzweil's own writings/talks identify five successive computing paradigms with integrated-circuit transistor shrinking as the fifth, preceded by electromechanical, relay, vacuum tube, and discrete transistor stages (or equivalent four). Mostly true if the five-paradigm structure holds with a minor labeling discrepancy. Mixed if the count is ambiguous. Mostly false if his framework names a different number such that it is not the fifth. False if his documented account contradicts this entirely.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 the Kurzweil Library (essay: the Law of Accelerating Returns) the Kurzweil Library (writingsbyraykurzweil.com) · January 2001 Own record
“This chart spans at least five distinct paradigms of computing, of which Moore’s Law pertains to only the latest one.”
-
E2 the Kurzweil Library (essay: the Law of Accelerating Returns) the Kurzweil Library (writingsbyraykurzweil.com) · January 2001 Own record
“It is important to note that Moore’s Law of Integrated Circuits was not the first, but the fifth paradigm to provide accelerating price-performance.”
-
E3 Ray Kurzweil's Abstract Carnegie Mellon University (cs.cmu.edu, hosting Kurzweil's conference abstract) · 1 January 2009 Own record
“From this exercise, it became apparent that the acceleration of computing power did not start with integrated circuits, but has continued through multiple paradigm shifts (electromechanical calculators, relays, vacuum tubes, transistors, and finally integrated circuits).”
-
E4 Technology in the 21st Century: an Imminent Intimate Merger the Kurzweil Library (thekurzweillibrary.com) · 14 May 2002 Own record
“Moore’s Law is the fifth paradigm, not the first, to provide exponential growth for computing”
Reasoning
The criteria ask what Kurzweil's own framework says, so his published writings are the right evidence here. His 2001 essay 'The Law of Accelerating Returns' says Moore's Law of Integrated Circuits 'was not the first, but the fifth paradigm' and that it covers only the latest of at least five paradigms (E1, E2). His May 2002 essay says the same thing (E4). His abstract hosted at CMU lists the five in order: electromechanical calculators, relays, vacuum tubes, transistors and integrated circuits (E3). That matches the structure the criteria require.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “Moore's Law (shrinking transistors on integrated circuits) was the fifth paradigm, not the first, to provide exponential growth in computing.” (said 12 December 2002). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_8d211f1d75de, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8d211f1d75de
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mixed
“But I got to 10 billion. It started to do things.”
Kurzweil said that at about 10 billion connections neural networks started to do things.
-
Mixed
“the cloud right now is expanding exponentially. It gets twice as fast every year for the same money.”
Cloud computing is expanding exponentially, doubling in speed every year for the same money.
-
Mostly false
“a 20 quadrillion–fold increase over 80 years.”
Computation/AI capability has increased 20 quadrillion-fold over 80 years.
-
Mostly true
“A computer can also remember billions or even trillions of facts perfectly, while we are hard pressed to remember a handful of phone numbers.”
-
Mostly false
“That was not true a year ago. But that’s true today.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.