Jon Stewart recently attacked Marc Andreessen.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “Jon Stewart recently attacked Marc Andreessen.” (said 26 January 2025). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_b0ba9bc98705, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b0ba9bc98705
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Marc Andreessen
-
Mostly true
“One is Substack, and I’m super proud of those guys because they started from scratch and declared right up front that they were going to be a free speech platform.”
Substack started from scratch and declared up front that it would be a free speech platform.
-
Mostly true
“I joined the board there in 2007 so I've seen everything in the last almost 20 years every step of the way.”
-
Mostly true
“Peter flatly says the iPhone doesn’t count as innovation.”
Peter Thiel flatly says the iPhone does not count as innovation.
-
Mostly true
“We started out; we didn’t do any healthcare related stuff here, investments here.”
Andreessen Horowitz initially made no healthcare-related investments.
-
Resolved true
“And we’ve now done an almost complete 180 on that.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.