ClaimsMarc Andreessen

“And we’ve now done an almost complete 180 on that.”

Marc Andreessen, a16z co-founder, interviewed 1 January 2018 The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Marc Andreessen (#163) (Tim Ferriss blog) archived copy

Factual Their own work or organisation

Andreessen Horowitz has since reversed course almost completely and is now deeply invested in healthcare.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.

What would count as true or false

Judge as of 1 January 2018. The claim is that Andreessen Horowitz had almost completely reversed an earlier stance of avoiding healthcare/bio and was by then heavily invested in that sector. TRUE: evidence shows (a) a16z earlier publicly stated or followed a policy of not investing in healthcare/life sciences, and (b) by the start of 2018 it had a dedicated healthcare/bio fund or practice (e.g., its 2015 Bio Fund, partners dedicated to the sector) and a substantial portfolio of healthcare/bio investments. MOSTLY TRUE: both hold, but a detail is overstated, e.g., the earlier avoidance was a strong reluctance rather than an absolute rule, or the healthcare commitment was smaller than 'deeply invested' suggests while still being a dedicated, significant practice. MIXED: only one of the two parts is supported (no clear prior avoidance, or only modest healthcare activity by 2018). MOSTLY FALSE: a16z had only a few incidental healthcare deals and no dedicated fund or team by January 2018. FALSE: a16z had invested substantially in healthcare all along (so there was no reversal), or had essentially no healthcare involvement by January 2018.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 This VC firm once pledged to never invest in health care. Now it's launching its third life sciences fund STAT · 4 February 2020

    “Marc Andreessen, famous for proclaiming that software was “eating the world,” said in 2009 that the one place his eponymous Silicon Valley venture capital firm would never invest was health care.”
  2. E2 Biotechs Drool as VC Firm Andreessen Horowitz Doubles Down on the Life Sciences With New $450M Fund BioSpace · 15 December 2017

    “In 2015, the firm established a fund with $200 million for investments.”
  3. E3 Biotechs Drool as VC Firm Andreessen Horowitz Doubles Down on the Life Sciences With New $450M Fund BioSpace · 15 December 2017

    “Since Andreesen Horowitz entered the life sciences funding field, the company has made 12 investments that span early detection of cancer, heart disease, and longevity.”
  4. E4 This VC firm once pledged to never invest in health care. Now it's launching its third life sciences fund STAT · 4 February 2020

    “On Tuesday, Andreessen Horowitz launched its third fund dedicated exclusively to health and biology.”

Reasoning

E1 (STAT) reports that Marc Andreessen said in 2009 that health care was the one place his firm would never invest. That indicates an earlier publicly stated intention to avoid the sector [E1]. BioSpace, writing in December 2017, reports that the firm set up a $200 million fund in 2015 (E2) and had made 12 life sciences investments, in areas including early cancer detection, heart disease and longevity (E3). The same article's title says a16z was "doubling down" with a new $450M life sciences fund. Before January 2018, therefore, a16z had a dedicated bio fund and a growing portfolio in the sector, which meets both parts of the criteria for a near-complete reversal.

Cite this claim

Marc Andreessen, “Andreessen Horowitz has since reversed course almost completely and is now deeply invested in healthcare.” (said 1 January 2018). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_055cea4b54c6, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_055cea4b54c6

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Marc Andreessen, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Marc Andreessen

  1. Mostly true Factual 26 January 2025
    “One is Substack, and I’m super proud of those guys because they started from scratch and declared right up front that they were going to be a free speech platform.”

    Substack started from scratch and declared up front that it would be a free speech platform.

  2. Mostly true Factual 26 January 2025
    “I joined the board there in 2007 so I've seen everything in the last almost 20 years every step of the way.”

    Marc Andreessen joined the Facebook board in 2007.

  3. Mostly true Factual 1 January 2018
    “Peter flatly says the iPhone doesn’t count as innovation.”

    Peter Thiel flatly says the iPhone does not count as innovation.

  4. Mostly true Factual 1 January 2018
    “We started out; we didn’t do any healthcare related stuff here, investments here.”

    Andreessen Horowitz initially made no healthcare-related investments.

  5. Mixed Factual June 1995
    “One of the first things I did when I went to the University of Illinois was start working in a research lab, at the university's physics research facility.”

    Early in his time at the University of Illinois, Andreessen started working in a research lab at the university's physics research facility.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.