Yudkowsky thinks AGI will be built on purpose about 10 years before it would otherwise happen by accident.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
A vague counterfactual-style prediction about deliberate vs accidental AGI timing with no horizon and no way to test.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Yudkowsky thinks AGI will be built on purpose about 10 years before it would otherwise happen by accident.” (said 28 February 2018). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_ad8c806d2b41, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_ad8c806d2b41
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly false
“So probably Paul’s going to win, but slight moral victory.”
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
-
Resolved true
“even if GPT-5 doesn’t end the world, which I agree is like more than 50% of where my probability mass lies”
GPT-5 will not end the world, with more than 50% of Yudkowsky's probability on that outcome.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.