The distinction between sharp, fragile human-written code and smooth biological computation is unlikely to be erased by programmer effort or new programming languages.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Open-ended prediction with no horizon and vague terms about 'erased' distinction.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “The distinction between sharp, fragile human-written code and smooth biological computation is unlikely to be erased by programmer effort or new programming languages.” (said 2007). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_ac9b5fe05c27, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_ac9b5fe05c27
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
-
Mostly true
“But I do feel quite confident that the upper range of that untapped potential is insufficient to outsmart all the living humans and implement the scenario that I'm worried about.”
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Mostly false
“So probably Paul’s going to win, but slight moral victory.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.