An AI built narrowly enough to be understood will not be able to defend against arbitrary unrestrained superintelligences.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Prediction about hypothetical unrestrained superintelligences with no horizon and no way to test.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “An AI built narrowly enough to be understood will not be able to defend against arbitrary unrestrained superintelligences.” (said 28 February 2018). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_8eeeac5b3db8, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8eeeac5b3db8
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
-
Resolved true
“even if GPT-5 doesn’t end the world, which I agree is like more than 50% of where my probability mass lies”
GPT-5 will not end the world, with more than 50% of Yudkowsky's probability on that outcome.
-
Mostly true
“Most AI researchers will not want to make unFriendly AIs.”
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.