Building dams reduces flood frequency but damage per flood becomes so much greater that average yearly damage increases.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Building dams reduces flood frequency but damage per flood becomes so much greater that average yearly damage increases.” (said 2008). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_8a4d3b137fbd, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8a4d3b137fbd
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly true
“Your annual reminder that there is no such thing whatsoever as a legal duty for a corporation's Board or management to maximize its profits.”
There is no legal duty for a corporation's board or management to maximize its profits.
-
Mostly true
“As you know, I've often earlier criticized the Fed for not creating enough money fast enough.”
-
Mixed
“I was observing that obvious-seeming hypothesis myself, sometime around the time of GPT 3.5.”
Yudkowsky himself observed the persona-selection-like hypothesis around the time of GPT 3.5.
-
Mostly true
“The test-passing preference stands on its own once formed.”
-
Mostly true
“LLMs surely have neural circuits they learned to model text streams from fictional and nonfictional personas that are not lying, deceiving, cheating.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.