ClaimsMichael Burry

“Because home prices have been rising so steadily for so long, troubled”

Michael Burry, Scion fund manager 2006 Scion Funds annual letters compilation (investorkurs.no)

Factual Economics and markets

Because home prices rose steadily for a long time, troubled homeowners were able to refinance, take cash out and often reduce monthly payments at the same time, which reduced foreclosure rates.

Mixed Partly true and partly false in roughly equal measure.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.

What would count as true or false

Judged as of 2006 against housing and mortgage data from the years before. The claim has three linked parts: (a) home prices had risen steadily for a long period; (b) this let troubled homeowners refinance, take cash out or lower their monthly payments; (c) this held down foreclosure rates. True: the data show a long, steady rise in national home prices (e.g. Case-Shiller or OFHEO, roughly the late 1990s to 2005–06), a high level of refinancing and cash-out refinancing, and foreclosure rates that were low or falling over that period, with economic research or industry analysis linking rising equity and refinancing to fewer foreclosures. Mostly true: all three parts hold but a minor detail is off, for example payments were not usually reduced even though refinancing and cash-out did avert defaults. Mixed: price growth and refinancing are documented, but the evidence that this lowered foreclosure rates is weak or contested, or foreclosure rates were not low. Mostly false: the mechanism is overstated, for example foreclosures were already rising markedly by 2006 despite rising prices, or refinancing played little role. False: the data show home prices were not rising steadily, or foreclosure rates were high or rising throughout the period.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 Microsoft Word - 1q05hpi615pm.doc Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), press release for 1Q 2005 House Price Index · 1 June 2005

    “House prices rose 12.5 percent, while prices of other goods and services rose only 3.1 percent.”
  2. E2 U.S. House Price Index Report - 4Q 2005 / December | FHFA Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) · 1 March 2006

    “House Price Appreciation Continues at Robust Pace. OFHEO House Price Index Shows Annual Rise of Nearly 13 Percent; Unprecedented Increases in 26 Metropolitan Areas.”
  3. E3 Understanding Mortgage Foreclosure: Recent Events, the Process, and Costs (Order Code RL34232) Congressional Research Service (Darryl E. Getter) · 26 March 2008

    “Subprime foreclosure rates declined markedly between 2002 and 2005.”
  4. E4 ARMs Fuel Jump In Home Foreclosures CBS News · 20 June 2006

    “In the last several years, millions of Americans took equity out of their houses and refinanced when interest rates were at historical lows and housing prices were at record highs.”

Reasoning

OFHEO data show strong house price growth: about 12.5% a year as of 1Q 2005 [E1] and nearly 13% a year at 4Q 2005 [E2]. However, these quotes cover only 2005 and do not by themselves show a long, steady rise. A June 2006 report says millions of Americans refinanced and took equity out of their homes in recent years [E4], and the CRS reports that subprime foreclosure rates fell markedly between 2002 and 2005 [E3]. None of the evidence includes research that links rising equity and refinancing to fewer foreclosures, so the causal part of the claim is not established and the claim is rated mixed.

Cite this claim

Michael Burry, “Because home prices rose steadily for a long time, troubled homeowners were able to refinance, take cash out and often reduce monthly payments at the same time, which reduced foreclosure rates.” (said 2006). Verdict: mixed. Reliability API, claim c_86f75eb29861, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_86f75eb29861

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Michael Burry, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Michael Burry

  1. Mostly false Factual 3 November 2026
    “The Superinvestors of Graham & Doddsville all lost money 3 years in a row during the mid-1970s.”

    The Superinvestors of Graham & Doddsville all lost money three years in a row during the mid-1970s.

  2. Mostly true Factual 30 October 2026
    “It’s a perfect storm for Build-A-Bear (BBW), a one-of-one retailer now heavily shorted, 25% of the float, almost 9 days to cover.”

    Build-A-Bear (BBW) is heavily shorted, with short interest at 25% of the float and almost 9 days to cover.

  3. Resolved true Factual 30 October 2026
    “Here is the link where I made the case last week that beneath the surface the October 6, 2026 record close in the S&P 500 looks more like the March 2000 top than any other record high since 1980.”

    Burry made the case the prior week that the October 6, 2026 S&P 500 record close looks more like the March 2000 top than any other record high since 1980.

  4. Mostly true Factual 24 October 2026
    “October 6, 2026 stands head to head with March 2000 as the two most narrow, thin, soft new highs”

    Across 982 S&P 500 record closes since 1980, October 6, 2026 and March 2000 are the two most narrow, thin, soft new highs by almost any measure.

  5. Mostly true Factual 11 October 2026
    “Both stocks have retraced essentially all their gains since Trump’s election, and they put in a giant head-and-shoulders-and-elbows top for added emphasis.”

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stocks have retraced essentially all their gains since Trump's election and formed a large head-and-shoulders top.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.