After completing its alcohol policy grant investigation, GiveWell will reflect on what it has learned about public health regulation before deciding whether to do additional work in this area.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Promise: Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Reasoning
Reflection and internal decision-making are internal, with no horizon.
Cite this claim
GiveWell, “After completing its alcohol policy grant investigation, GiveWell will reflect on what it has learned about public health regulation before deciding whether to do additional work in this area.” (said 28 May 2020). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_7f76a2d88abd, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7f76a2d88abd
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More promise claims by GiveWell
-
Delivered on time
“Winners will be announced by December 15, 2022.”
GiveWell will announce contest winners by December 15, 2022.
-
Mostly false
“We hope to conduct in-depth reviews of one to two other charities (most likely Precision Agriculture for Development and/or Sanku, though possibly others) as well, but may have limited capacity to do…”
-
Mostly true
“We will make these grants if we believe they are more cost-effective than the opportunities to which we would otherwise direct funds.”
-
Mostly true
“This year, we expect to complete our review of the RCT results and to make a decision about whether to direct additional funding to support New Incentives’ work.”
-
Resolved true
“we’ll be trying to examine ourselves as dispassionately and critically as possible, and sharing our self-review in something close to real time via this blog.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.