A superintelligence would not need new physics to build weapons of unstoppable deadliness.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
A hypothetical claim about what a future superintelligence would need, with no horizon and not testable.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “A superintelligence would not need new physics to build weapons of unstoppable deadliness.” (said September 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_7c05692dbc9e, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7c05692dbc9e
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
-
Resolved true
“even if GPT-5 doesn’t end the world, which I agree is like more than 50% of where my probability mass lies”
GPT-5 will not end the world, with more than 50% of Yudkowsky's probability on that outcome.
-
Mostly true
“Most AI researchers will not want to make unFriendly AIs.”
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.