ClaimsRay Kurzweil

“it would be easier to create + release this highly destructive virus from the genetic data than it would be to build + detonate an atomic bomb given only its design”

Kurzweil and Joy, op-ed authors October 2005 A recipe for destruction (NYT op-ed with Bill Joy) (Kurzweil Library / NYT) archived copy

Factual Biosecurity

Creating and releasing the 1918 flu virus from its published genetic data would be easier than building and detonating an atomic bomb from its design, since no rare materials like plutonium or enriched uranium are needed.

Research failed Research could not run for this claim; not scored.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

Judge on expert biosecurity and nonproliferation assessments current as of October 2005. True: expert assessments agreed that recreating and releasing the 1918 flu virus from its published sequence was easier than building and detonating a nuclear weapon from its design, partly because no plutonium or enriched uranium is needed. Mostly true: experts broadly agreed, with minor caveats. Mixed: expert opinion was split. Mostly false: the premise that no rare materials are needed is true, but experts held that the comparison was unproven or overstated, for example because synthesis required substantial tacit skill. False: expert evidence showed the virus route to be clearly harder.

Set before the research began.

Reasoning

Research or judging failed: research_plan:c_7a9059a96abe: refusal

Cite this claim

Ray Kurzweil, “Creating and releasing the 1918 flu virus from its published genetic data would be easier than building and detonating an atomic bomb from its design, since no rare materials like plutonium or enriched uranium are needed.” (said October 2005). Verdict: research failed. Reliability API, claim c_7a9059a96abe, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7a9059a96abe

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Ray Kurzweil, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil

  1. Resolved false Factual 9 July 2024
    “Moderna, they actually gathered several billion different possibilities for what could cause COVID.”

    Moderna gathered several billion possibilities for what could cause COVID and used simulated trials with AI to narrow them.

  2. Resolved true Factual April 2022
    “The US government has a plan to actually create new vaccines within a few months to three months.”

    The US government has a plan to create new vaccines within a few months to three months.

  3. Mostly true Factual May 2020
    “US researchers are now testing this optimized flu vaccine on human subjects.”

    As of May 2020, US researchers are testing the Flinders-optimized flu vaccine on human subjects.

  4. Mostly true Factual May 2020
    “created a turbo-charged flu vaccine in part by using a biology simulator that used AI to find drugs that activate the human immune system.”

    In 2019 researchers at Flinders University in Adelaide created a turbo-charged flu vaccine partly using an AI biology simulator that found drugs activating the human immune system.

  5. Resolved true Factual October 2005
    “There are promising new technologies, like RNA interference, that could be harnessed.”

    New technologies such as RNA interference are promising and could be harnessed against viral threats.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.