Cautiously considering what a more foresightful and less accretive design for intelligence might look like, Yudkowsky suggested that in an AI the center of gravity of intelligence, the process humans observe through their internal narrative, would probably become the central supersystem of the mind, to an even greater degree than in humans.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Speculative prediction about future AI architecture with no horizon.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Cautiously considering what a more foresightful and less accretive design for intelligence might look like, Yudkowsky suggested that in an AI the center of gravity of intelligence, the process humans observe through their internal narrative, would probably become the central supersystem of the mind, to an even greater degree than in humans.” (said 2007). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_64ad8a80b15d, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_64ad8a80b15d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
-
Mostly true
“But I do feel quite confident that the upper range of that untapped potential is insufficient to outsmart all the living humans and implement the scenario that I'm worried about.”
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Mostly false
“So probably Paul’s going to win, but slight moral victory.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.