Recent AI progress has forced Pinker to update his earlier arguments against connectionism.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Steven Pinker, “Recent AI progress has forced Pinker to update his earlier arguments against connectionism.” (said 7 October 2026). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_5b790030d3d6, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_5b790030d3d6
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Steven Pinker
-
Resolved true
“To be sure, my arguments were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots, and I would update some of them today.”
Pinker's arguments on AI risk were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots.
-
Mostly true
“I’ve got to say that I’m one of the ones who said that’s just not how language works.”
Pinker was among those who argued that predicting the next word is not how language works.
-
Resolved true
“discovered and edited by me & Harvey Silverglate”
-
Resolved true
“Social and Political Bias: Newest lecture in Gen Ed 1066, Rationality.”
The newest lecture in Gen Ed 1066, Rationality, is titled Social and Political Bias.
-
Resolved true
“Perhaps recklessly, I took on this assignment from the Financial Times for their end-of-year issue.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.