ClaimsSteven Pinker

“Perhaps recklessly, I took on this assignment from the Financial Times for their end-of-year issue.”

Steven Pinker, on X 27 December 2019 Post by @sapinker on X, 2019-12-27 (X)

Factual Their own work or organisation

Pinker took on an assignment from the Financial Times to write about what to expect from the 2020s for its end-of-year issue.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

The second judge said mostly true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.

What would count as true or false

Judged as of 2019-12-27. True: the Financial Times published, in or for its end-of-year 2019 issue (late December 2019), a piece by Pinker about what to expect in the 2020s. Mostly true: the FT published such a Pinker piece around that time, but a minor detail differs (e.g. it ran in a weekend/online feature rather than the end-of-year issue, or its topic was slightly broader). Mixed: Pinker wrote an FT piece at that time on a different topic, or a forecast of the 2020s appeared in a different outlet. Mostly false: Pinker took part in an FT end-of-year feature only as one of many quoted contributors and did not write the piece. False: evidence shows that no such FT assignment or piece by Pinker exists.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (2)

  1. E1 stevenpinker.com · files · pinker, Curriculum Vitae Steven Pinker stevenpinker.com (Steven Pinker's CV, October 2025 version) Own record

    “Pinker, S. (2019) What can we expect from the 2020s? Financial Times, Dec. Dec. 27.”
  2. E2 Publications Steven Pinker (stevenpinker.com, OpenScholar site listing publications by year) Own record

    “Pinker, S. (2019). What can we expect from the 2020s?.”

Reasoning

Pinker's CV (E1) lists a specific publication, "What can we expect from the 2020s?", in the Financial Times dated December 27, 2019. That fits the claim that he wrote a 2020s forecast for the FT's end-of-year issue. His publications page (E2) lists the same 2019 title. Both sources come from Pinker himself, but they are specific bibliographic records of the published piece, not general statements, and nothing in the evidence contradicts them.

Cite this claim

Steven Pinker, “Pinker took on an assignment from the Financial Times to write about what to expect from the 2020s for its end-of-year issue.” (said 27 December 2019). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_108dd0d2d831, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_108dd0d2d831

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Steven Pinker, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Steven Pinker

  1. Resolved true Factual 26 September 2026
    “To be sure, my arguments were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots, and I would update some of them today.”

    Pinker's arguments on AI risk were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots.

  2. Mostly true Factual 2023
    “I’ve got to say that I’m one of the ones who said that’s just not how language works.”

    Pinker was among those who argued that predicting the next word is not how language works.

  3. Resolved true Factual 24 December 2022
    “discovered and edited by me & Harvey Silverglate”

    The lost Carl Sagan lecture 'Science and Civil Liberties' was discovered and edited by Steven Pinker and Harvey Silverglate and appeared in Quillette's 2022 Editors' Choice.

  4. Resolved true Factual 12 March 2020
    “Social and Political Bias: Newest lecture in Gen Ed 1066, Rationality.”

    The newest lecture in Gen Ed 1066, Rationality, is titled Social and Political Bias.

  5. Resolved true Factual 23 December 2019
    “NIPS vs. NeurIPS: guest post by Steven Pinker”

    Steven Pinker wrote a guest post titled 'NIPS vs. NeurIPS' on Scott Aaronson's blog Shtetl-Optimized.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.