Steven Pinker wrote a guest post titled 'NIPS vs. NeurIPS' on Scott Aaronson's blog Shtetl-Optimized.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
True if a post titled 'NIPS vs. NeurIPS' (or close variant, e.g. with 'guest post by Steven Pinker') appeared on Scott Aaronson's blog Shtetl-Optimized and was written by Steven Pinker, published on or around 2019-12-23. Mostly true if Pinker wrote such a guest post on Shtetl-Optimized but the title or date differs slightly (e.g. a different wording or a date a few days off). Mixed if Pinker's text appeared on the blog but only quoted or excerpted by Aaronson rather than as a guest post, or the post was on a different blog by Aaronson. Mostly false if the post exists but was mainly written by someone else with only minor input from Pinker. False if the blog archive shows no such post, or shows it was written by someone else entirely.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 December 2019 – Shtetl-Optimized Shtetl-Optimized (Scott Aaronson's blog) · 28 December 2019
“In the wake of two culture-war posts—the first on the term “quantum supremacy,” the second on the acronym “NIPS”—it’s clear”
-
E2 NIPS vs. NeurIPS: guest post by Steven Pinker Scott Aaronson's blog, Shtetl-Optimized (scottaaronson.blog) · 23 December 2019
“today all of us here at Shtetl-Optimized are humbled to host a guest post by Steven Pinker: the Johnstone Professor of Psychology at Harvard University”
-
E3 NIPS vs. NeurIPS: guest post by Steven Pinker Scott Aaronson's blog, Shtetl-Optimized (scottaaronson.blog) · 23 December 2019
“Steve’s guest post today consists of his response to this email.”
Reasoning
E4 and E5 come from the Shtetl-Optimized post titled "NIPS vs. NeurIPS: guest post by Steven Pinker," dated 2019-12-23. In it, Aaronson says the blog is hosting a guest post by Steven Pinker and that the post's body is Pinker's response to an email. E2, the blog's December 2019 archive, also refers to the post on the acronym "NIPS." The title, blog, author and date all match the criteria for true.
Cite this claim
Steven Pinker, “Steven Pinker wrote a guest post titled 'NIPS vs. NeurIPS' on Scott Aaronson's blog Shtetl-Optimized.” (said 23 December 2019). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_3d0b708856fa, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_3d0b708856fa
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Steven Pinker
-
Resolved true
“To be sure, my arguments were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots, and I would update some of them today.”
Pinker's arguments on AI risk were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots.
-
Mostly true
“I’ve got to say that I’m one of the ones who said that’s just not how language works.”
Pinker was among those who argued that predicting the next word is not how language works.
-
Resolved true
“discovered and edited by me & Harvey Silverglate”
-
Resolved true
“Social and Political Bias: Newest lecture in Gen Ed 1066, Rationality.”
The newest lecture in Gen Ed 1066, Rationality, is titled Social and Political Bias.
-
Resolved true
“Perhaps recklessly, I took on this assignment from the Financial Times for their end-of-year issue.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.