CFAR (named in the surroundings as the "Center For Applied Rationale") did not get as far as buying an fMRI machine, and it had no funding.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
CFAR's internal funding and purchase plans are mostly not public.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “CFAR (named in the surroundings as the "Center For Applied Rationale") did not get as far as buying an fMRI machine, and it had no funding.” (said 6 April 2023). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_52f02478ea07, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_52f02478ea07
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly true
“I mean, as far as I know, I'm the person who originally made that argument.”
Yudkowsky said that, as far as he knows, he was the person who originally made that argument.
-
Resolved true
“I refrained from signing because I think the letter is understating the seriousness of the situation and asking for too little to solve it.”
-
Mixed
“MIRI has something called the Visible Thoughts Project, which did not get enough funding and enough personnel and was going too slowly.”
-
Mostly true
“I have refused to deploy timelines with fancy probabilities on them consistently for many years”
-
Mostly true
“I previously thought that when intelligence was built, there were going to be multiple specialized systems in there.”
Yudkowsky previously thought that building intelligence would involve multiple specialized systems.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.