Most protein structure prediction algorithms before AlphaFold were quite slow.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Demis Hassabis, “Most protein structure prediction algorithms before AlphaFold were quite slow.” (said 10 April 2026). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_4fcb9ecb1d47, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_4fcb9ecb1d47
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Demis Hassabis
-
Mostly true
“what’s important about them is their 3D structure.”
A protein's 3D structure is what determines, or partially determines, its function.
-
Resolved true
“So over 3 million scientists are now using AlphaFold.”
-
Resolved true
“Only about 10% of drugs actually get through all the clinical stages.”
Only about 10% of drugs get through all the clinical stages.
-
Mostly true
“The AlphaFold Server is empowering non-commercial researchers globally to harness this technology, accelerating their ability to formulate and test new hypotheses.”
-
Mostly true
“Our AlphaProteo model can design novel, high-strength protein binders that target diverse molecules – including those associated with cancer and diabetes.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.