A deliberately designed AI is likely to begin as a set of subsystems in a primitive, undeveloped state already designed to form a functioning supersystem.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Prediction about how a future AI would begin, with no horizon and no clear test.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “A deliberately designed AI is likely to begin as a set of subsystems in a primitive, undeveloped state already designed to form a functioning supersystem.” (said 2007). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_3349d747230b, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_3349d747230b
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
-
Mostly true
“But I do feel quite confident that the upper range of that untapped potential is insufficient to outsmart all the living humans and implement the scenario that I'm worried about.”
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Mostly false
“So probably Paul’s going to win, but slight moral victory.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.