Nate Soares has written a post about the common mistakes everyone makes when coming into AI alignment.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2023-04-06. True: a post written by Nate Soares and published on or before 2023-04-06 (e.g., on LessWrong, the Alignment Forum, the MIRI blog or his own blog) addresses the common mistakes or failure patterns of people new to AI alignment. Mostly true: such a post exists, but its focus is somewhat broader or narrower than 'mistakes newcomers make' (e.g., how most alignment plans miss the hard parts), while still clearly covering that theme. Mixed: Soares wrote on related topics, but no single post substantially matches the description. Mostly false: the matching post was published after 2023-04-06, or was written mainly by someone else with Soares only a minor contributor. False: Soares's publication record up to that date shows no post on this topic.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 On how various plans miss the hard bits of the alignment challenge — LessWrong LessWrong (AI Alignment Forum crosspost) · 12 July 2022 Own record
“Nevertheless, my overall impression is that most of the new people coming into alignment research end up pursuing research that seems doomed to me, not just because they're unlikely to succeed at their stated research goals, but because their stated research goals have little overlap with what seem to me to be the tricky bits.”
-
E2 On how various plans miss the hard bits of the alignment challenge — LessWrong LessWrong (AI Alignment Forum crosspost) · 12 July 2022 Own record
“a bunch of plans like Owen's (that seem to me to just completely miss the problem),”
-
E3 Most People Start With The Same Few Bad Ideas — LessWrong LessWrong (AI Alignment Forum crosspost) · 9 September 2022 Own record
“It turns out that most newcomers to alignment have the *same* few Bad Ideas.”
Reasoning
E1–E3 show LessWrong posts from before 2023-04-06 about newcomers to alignment missing the hard parts or sharing the same bad ideas. None of the evidence shows who wrote these posts, so it does not establish that Nate Soares wrote one, which the criteria require.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Nate Soares has written a post about the common mistakes everyone makes when coming into AI alignment.” (said 6 April 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_28d032c857a2, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_28d032c857a2
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly true
“I mean, as far as I know, I'm the person who originally made that argument.”
Yudkowsky said that, as far as he knows, he was the person who originally made that argument.
-
Resolved true
“I refrained from signing because I think the letter is understating the seriousness of the situation and asking for too little to solve it.”
-
Mixed
“MIRI has something called the Visible Thoughts Project, which did not get enough funding and enough personnel and was going too slowly.”
-
Mostly true
“I have refused to deploy timelines with fancy probabilities on them consistently for many years”
-
Mostly true
“I previously thought that when intelligence was built, there were going to be multiple specialized systems in there.”
Yudkowsky previously thought that building intelligence would involve multiple specialized systems.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.