Large language models do not see, feel or experience.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Whether LLMs experience anything concerns inner states and cannot be settled by public record.
Cite this claim
Steven Pinker, “Large language models do not see, feel or experience.” (said 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_27bc5dcaf350, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_27bc5dcaf350
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Steven Pinker
-
Mostly true
“A major fact about language, known for decades, is that people don’t blurt out what they mean”
-
Mostly true
“Computers have always been better at some of the things that humans do, otherwise we never would have adopted them”
-
Resolved true
“then it is very much unlike AlphaGo, with this closed universe governed by fixed rules.”
AlphaGo operated in a closed universe governed by fixed rules, unlike the open-loop real world.
-
Mostly true
“The capabilities of LLMs trained on gargantuan datasets are more general than I (and almost everyone else) would have guessed at the time.”
-
Mostly true
“There are some features in large language models that actually implicitly build in some of the insight of linguistics.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.