Each contest entry will be reviewed by at least one GiveWell researcher with substantial experience with its cost-effectiveness analyses.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Promise: Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Reasoning
Internal review assignments of entries are not publicly recorded.
Cite this claim
GiveWell, “Each contest entry will be reviewed by at least one GiveWell researcher with substantial experience with its cost-effectiveness analyses.” (said 6 April 2022). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_07c57b70d1e5, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_07c57b70d1e5
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More promise claims by GiveWell
-
Delivered on time
“Winners will be announced by December 15, 2022.”
GiveWell will announce contest winners by December 15, 2022.
-
Mostly false
“We hope to conduct in-depth reviews of one to two other charities (most likely Precision Agriculture for Development and/or Sanku, though possibly others) as well, but may have limited capacity to do…”
-
Mostly true
“We will make these grants if we believe they are more cost-effective than the opportunities to which we would otherwise direct funds.”
-
Mostly true
“This year, we expect to complete our review of the RCT results and to make a decision about whether to direct additional funding to support New Incentives’ work.”
-
Resolved true
“we’ll be trying to examine ourselves as dispassionately and critically as possible, and sharing our self-review in something close to real time via this blog.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.