Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
83 77 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
69 49 87 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
69 49 87
All types combined: 81 (likely 76 to 86, high confidence), from 87 claims: 77 factual claims, 5 predictions, 5 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Sam Altman's claims
108 claims · page 2 of 2
“Progression of machine intelligence is a double exponential function;”
Sam Altman, blog author February 2015 Machine intelligence, part 1 (Sam Altman's blog)
The progression of machine intelligence is a double exponential function.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Reasoning
Vague claim about the functional form of machine intelligence progress, with no defined metric or horizon.
Cite this claim
Sam Altman, “The progression of machine intelligence is a double exponential function.” (said February 2015). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_a127bde45905, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a127bde45905
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Sam Altman? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.