Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
71 64 78 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 0 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 71 (likely 64 to 78, medium confidence), from 55 claims: 55 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Peter Thiel's claims
34 claims
“In Goethe's "Faust," he has a pact with the devil and he sort of gets this knowledge by morally dubious means.”
Peter Thiel, podcast guest 30 September 2026 Peter Thiel said, 'If you're evil, you're not bad.' Here's the context (Snopes)
In Goethe's Faust, Faust makes a pact with the devil and, in Thiel's words, "sort of" gains knowledge by morally dubious means.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge against the text of Goethe's Faust (Parts I and II) and standard literary scholarship, allowing for the speaker's hedge ('sort of'). True: Faust makes a pact or wager with the devil (Mephistopheles), and through it gains knowledge, experience or powers by morally dubious means. Mostly true: the pact is present, but what Faust seeks and gains is better described as experience, pleasure or worldly power than knowledge. Mixed: the deal is substantially different from a pact with the devil, or the moral character of the means is not supported. Mostly false: there is no meaningful pact. False: neither element appears in Goethe's work.
Evidence
- Faust | Goethe, Summary, Characters, & Facts | Britannica Encyclopedia Britannica · 30 September 2026
“Part I sets out the magician Faust’s despair, his pact with Mephistopheles, and his love for Gretchen.”
- The Three Fausts - First Things First Things (essay by Stephen C. Meredith, University of Chicago) · 1 June 2015
“He engages in a wager with the devil, not a pact, and does so for the sake of striving itself—striving that never comes to rest or completion, and never attains or can attain satisfaction.”
- Putting It in Writing: Drafting Faust's Contract with the Devil | Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence | Cambridge Core Cambridge University Press (Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence) · 9 June 2015
“Indeed, the action in both dramas turns on Faust's use of Mephistopheles' magic: in the case of Goethe, to seduce his beloved Margaret and, in Marlowe, to satisfy his lust for power.”
Reasoning
Britannica confirms that Part I of Goethe's Faust includes Faust's pact with Mephistopheles (E2). A law-journal article says the action turns on Faust using Mephistopheles' magic to seduce Margaret, which supports the "morally dubious means" element (E4). However, the First Things essay calls the deal a wager rather than a pact, made for the sake of endless striving (E3). That fits the criteria's "mostly true" case: the pact is present, but what Faust seeks is better described as experience than knowledge.
Cite this claim
Peter Thiel, “In Goethe's Faust, Faust makes a pact with the devil and, in Thiel's words, "sort of" gains knowledge by morally dubious means.” (said 30 September 2026). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_69c652876e10, method 0.1.0+3e03e2df. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_69c652876e10
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Peter Thiel? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.