Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
71 64 78 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 0 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 71 (likely 64 to 78, medium confidence), from 55 claims: 55 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Peter Thiel's claims
27 claims
“I still think he will be reelected because people understand the stakes.”
Peter Thiel, interviewee 25 September 2026 Peter Thiel interview: AI, Europe, Trump, democracy and longevity (Hvylya)
Thiel said he thinks Javier Milei will be reelected because people understand the stakes.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
Milei's next election is scheduled for 2027, so reelection can't be known yet.
Cite this claim
Peter Thiel, “Thiel said he thinks Javier Milei will be reelected because people understand the stakes.” (said 25 September 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_16ce0726bf2b, method 0.1.0+3e03e2df. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_16ce0726bf2b
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Peter Thiel? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.