Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
227 claims · page 3 of 3
“Funds from operation (FFO) to adjusted net debt is expected to be around 25% in 2014 on the assumption that the equity injection is completed.”
DONG Energy (Ørsted), company announcement February 2014 Announcement of financial results for 2013 - Improved earnings and strengthened capital base (Ørsted (DONG Energy))
DONG Energy expects FFO to adjusted net debt of around 25% in 2014, assuming the equity injection is completed.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
What would count as true or false
Compare DONG Energy's reported 2014 FFO/adjusted net debt ratio with the predicted figure of around 25%. The prediction assumes the equity injection was completed; if it was not completed in 2014, the prediction cannot be resolved. True: the reported ratio is 23-27%. Mostly true: it is 21-23% or 27-29%. Mostly false: it is 18-21% or 29-33%. False: it is below 18% or above 33%. Mixed is not used.
Evidence
- INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT 9M 2014 DONG Energy (Ørsted) · 31 October 2014 Own record
“FFO/Adjusted net debt for 2014 expected to exceed 28% (previous expectation around 25%)”
- [PDF] CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DONG Energy (Ørsted) · 20 October 2025 Own record
“The capital injection was implemented on 20 February 2014.”
Reasoning
E2 shows the equity injection, the prediction's stated condition, was completed on 20 February 2014. The only evidence on the ratio itself is the company's October 2014 interim outlook (E1), which raised its 2014 FFO/adjusted net debt expectation to above 28% and reported a 9M ratio of 32%. That points away from the predicted ~25%, but neither item gives the reported full-year 2014 figure the criteria require, and above 28% could fall in the mostly-true, mostly-false or false band, so the claim cannot be resolved.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “DONG Energy expects FFO to adjusted net debt of around 25% in 2014, assuming the equity injection is completed.” (said February 2014). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_075908d8761b, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_075908d8761b
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.