Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
46 claims
“The challenge we face in transforming the world’s energy systems from fossil fuels to renewable energy to avoid the catastrophic consequences of climate change is more pressing than ever and requires action in all parts of society.”
Mads Nipper, incoming CEO of Ørsted 9 September 2020 Ørsted appoints Mads Nipper the next CEO of Ørsted (Ørsted)
The challenge we face in transforming the world’s energy systems from fossil fuels to renewable energy to avoid the catastrophic…
Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “The challenge we face in transforming the world’s energy systems from fossil fuels to renewable energy to avoid the catastrophic…” (said 9 September 2020). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_b18d980e9956, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b18d980e9956
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.