Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
46 claims
“As the refocusing of Ørsted continues, we’re ready to invest in value-creating opportunities in Europe and select markets in APAC, where we see encouraging and concrete progress from governments and regulators in relation to upcoming tenders.”
Rasmus Errboe, Group President and CEO of Ørsted 6 May 2026 Ørsted delivers progress and strong operational performance (Ørsted)
As the refocusing of Ørsted continues, we’re ready to invest in value-creating opportunities in Europe and select markets in APAC, where we…
Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “As the refocusing of Ørsted continues, we’re ready to invest in value-creating opportunities in Europe and select markets in APAC, where we…” (said 6 May 2026). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_a3c1fd2c2a29, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a3c1fd2c2a29
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.