Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
25 claims
“The previously expected gross investment of DKK ~350 billion (2020-2027) is trending higher at DKK 380 billion.”
Ørsted, company announcement 7 June 2023 Capital Markets Day: Ørsted confirms its ambition of ~50 GW renewable capacity by 2030 (Investegate (Ørsted))
Ørsted's gross investment for 2020-2027, previously expected at about DKK 350 billion, is trending higher at DKK 380 billion.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2027 is after 2026-10-10
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Ørsted's gross investment for 2020-2027, previously expected at about DKK 350 billion, is trending higher at DKK 380 billion.” (said 7 June 2023). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_9b209bef94ab, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_9b209bef94ab
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.