Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
227 claims · page 3 of 3
“At the same time, we have realised cost savings of DKK 1.4 billion and turned around the current earnings from our gas activities from a substantial loss in 2012 to a profit.”
Henrik Poulsen, CEO of DONG Energy February 2014 Announcement of financial results for 2013 - Improved earnings and strengthened capital base (Ørsted (DONG Energy))
DONG Energy realised cost savings of DKK 1.4 billion and turned current earnings from its gas activities from a substantial loss in 2012 to a profit.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “DONG Energy realised cost savings of DKK 1.4 billion and turned current earnings from its gas activities from a substantial loss in 2012 to a profit.” (said February 2014). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_8daf7e2affb7, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8daf7e2affb7
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.