Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
25 claims
“Based on the financial performance in H1 2026, we remain on track to deliver our 2026 financial guidance of EBITDA above DKK28 billion excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees.”
Ørsted 13 August 2026 Ørsted continues its strategic progress, delivers solid operational performance, and is on track to deliver on its 2026 financial guidance (Ørsted)
Ørsted will deliver 2026 EBITDA above DKK 28 billion excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-10-10
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Ørsted will deliver 2026 EBITDA above DKK 28 billion excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees.” (said 13 August 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_72c8002630c0, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_72c8002630c0
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.