Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
25 claims
“Ørsted reaffirms its target of ~50 GW renewable capacity in 2030”
Ørsted, company announcement 7 June 2023 Capital Markets Day: Ørsted confirms its ambition of ~50 GW renewable capacity by 2030 (Investegate (Ørsted))
Ørsted reaffirms its target of about 50 GW of renewable capacity in 2030.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2030 is after 2026-10-10
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Ørsted reaffirms its target of about 50 GW of renewable capacity in 2030.” (said 7 June 2023). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_6fbfe6ad22a3, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6fbfe6ad22a3
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.