Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
25 claims
“We are now taking the next step as we aim to phase out coal completely from our power and heat generation by 2023.”
DONG Energy 2017 DONG Energy Annual report 2016 Summary (DONG Energy)
DONG Energy aims to phase out coal completely from its power and heat generation by 2023.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
The 2023 coal phase-out deadline is still in the future relative to 2026? No, it has passed, but Ørsted's public reports can confirm the outcome.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “DONG Energy aims to phase out coal completely from its power and heat generation by 2023.” (said 2017). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_6da799271a4a, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6da799271a4a
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.