Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
16 claims
“Wind Power's EBITDA increased by 74% to DKK 20.6 billion.”
Ørsted February 2018 Annual report 2017 - Strong results support Ørsted's green transformation (Ørsted)
Ørsted's Wind Power EBITDA increased by 74% to DKK 20.6 billion in 2017.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
What would count as true or false
True if Ørsted's 2017 annual report shows Wind Power EBITDA of DKK 20.6 billion, up about 74% from 2016. Mostly true if the EBITDA is within ±0.2 billion or the growth rate is within a few percentage points. Mixed if one of the two numbers is materially off. False if both are materially off.
Evidence
- Ørsted Annual report 2017 Ørsted · February 2018 Own record
“Wind Power’s EBITDA increased by 74% to DKK 20.6 billion, of which the farm-downs of 50% of Walney Extension and Borkum Riffgrund 2 accounted for almost half”
- [PDF] Ørsted Summary 2017 Ørsted Own record
“Wind Power’s EBITDA increased by 74% to DKK 20.6 billion, of which the farm-downs of 50% of Walney Extension and Borkum Riffgrund 2 accounted for almost half”
Reasoning
The resolution criteria tie the claim to Ørsted's 2017 annual report. E1, the published annual report itself, states that Wind Power's EBITDA increased by 74% to DKK 20.6 billion, and E2, the 2017 summary report, gives the same figures. Both sources come from the subject, but the criteria name the annual report as the reference, so the claim resolves true.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Ørsted's Wind Power EBITDA increased by 74% to DKK 20.6 billion in 2017.” (said February 2018). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_6849d3c7cd6f, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6849d3c7cd6f
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.