Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
16 claims
“Net investments were DKK 5.9 billion compared with DKK 13.4 billion in 2012.”
DONG Energy (Ørsted), company announcement February 2014 Announcement of financial results for 2013 - Improved earnings and strengthened capital base (Ørsted (DONG Energy))
DONG Energy's net investments were DKK 5.9 billion in 2013, compared with DKK 13.4 billion in 2012.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
What would count as true or false
True if DONG Energy's reported net investments were DKK 5.9 billion for 2013 and DKK 13.4 billion for 2012 (rounding to one decimal acceptable). Mostly true if one figure is off by a small amount (≤0.2bn) while the other matches and the comparison direction holds. Mixed if one figure matches and the other is materially off. Mostly false if both figures are off but the sharp decline is still shown. False if the reported figures are substantially different or show no comparable decline.
Evidence
- [PDF] FINANCIAL REPORT DONG Energy (Ørsted) · 5 February 2014 Own record
“Net investments of DKK 5.9bn (down 56% y/y)”
- [PDF] FINANCIAL REPORT DONG Energy (Ørsted) · 5 February 2014 Own record
“Net investments-5,902-13,350”
Reasoning
The criteria ask about DONG Energy's reported net investments, and the company's full-year 2013 results table lists DKK 5,902 million for 2013 and DKK 13,350 million for 2012 (E2). These round to 5.9bn and 13.4bn. The same presentation states net investments of DKK 5.9bn, down 56% year on year, which is consistent with those figures (E1). Both sources are the subject's own publication, but the claim concerns what was reported, and the published table is that record.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “DONG Energy's net investments were DKK 5.9 billion in 2013, compared with DKK 13.4 billion in 2012.” (said February 2014). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_66d8bfc76a40, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_66d8bfc76a40
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.