Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
25 claims
“The dividend policy is expected to start at a modest level, will apply to the financial years 2026–2028, and is expected to increase annually.”
Ørsted 13 August 2026 Ørsted continues its strategic progress, delivers solid operational performance, and is on track to deliver on its 2026 financial guidance (Ørsted)
Ørsted's dividend policy for financial years 2026-2028 is expected to start at a modest level and increase annually.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2028 is after 2026-10-10
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Ørsted's dividend policy for financial years 2026-2028 is expected to start at a modest level and increase annually.” (said 13 August 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_3e7d3ee00035, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_3e7d3ee00035
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.