Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
46 claims
“With the offshore wind industry’s largest concrete development pipeline, our global development organisation, and our industry-leading commitment to innovation, it’s our clear aspiration to remain the global market leader in offshore wind.”
Mads Nipper, Group President and CEO of Ørsted 2 June 2021 Ørsted accelerates growth to realise its full potential as a global green energy major (GlobeNewswire (Ørsted))
With the offshore wind industry’s largest concrete development pipeline, our global development organisation, and our industry-leading…
Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “With the offshore wind industry’s largest concrete development pipeline, our global development organisation, and our industry-leading…” (said 2 June 2021). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_07f3f00a496d, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_07f3f00a496d
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.