Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 73 93 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
46 27 65 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
60 40 79
All types combined: 70 (likely 61 to 78, medium confidence), from 29 claims: 16 factual claims, 7 predictions, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Ørsted's claims
25 claims
“we now set the ambition that no later than 2030, all new projects commissioned must have a net-positive biodiversity impact”
Mads Nipper, Group President and CEO of Ørsted 2 June 2021 Ørsted accelerates growth to realise its full potential as a global green energy major (GlobeNewswire (Ørsted))
Ørsted sets the ambition that no later than 2030 all new projects it commissions will have a net-positive biodiversity impact.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
deadline 2030 is after 2026-10-10
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Ørsted sets the ambition that no later than 2030 all new projects it commissions will have a net-positive biodiversity impact.” (said 2 June 2021). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_078dbc7c940f, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_078dbc7c940f
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Ørsted? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.