Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
83 78 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 83 (likely 78 to 88, high confidence), from 86 claims: 86 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Daniela Amodei's claims
38 claims
“So there were seven of us that originally left, me and Dario and our five co-founders”
Daniela Amodei, Anthropic president, interviewee 29 June 2026 Daniela Amodei Says Curiosity Is Underrated (Stanford GSB)
Seven people originally left OpenAI to found Anthropic: Daniela and Dario Amodei and five co-founders.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
The second judge said mixed; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
True: authoritative records (Anthropic official materials or reliable reporting) show that the original group of Anthropic co-founders who left OpenAI numbered seven, including Daniela and Dario Amodei. Mostly true: the founding group was seven, but a minor detail is off, for example one co-founder did not come directly from OpenAI or left at a slightly different time. Mixed: the count is disputed between sources. Mostly false: the founding group who left OpenAI was clearly a different number (for example, six or eight or more co-founders), though the Amodeis and others did leave OpenAI to found it. False: Anthropic was not founded by people leaving OpenAI.
Evidence
- Anthropic - Wikipedia Wikipedia
“Anthropic was founded in January 2021[1] by seven former employees of OpenAI, including siblings Daniela Amodei and Dario Amodei, the latter of whom was OpenAI's Vice President of Research.”
- Who are the Anthropic 8? The new billionaires deciding the future of AI — and SF San Francisco Standard · 10 August 2026
“When Anthropic’s biggest names talk about the founding team, they usually mention seven names. Benjamin Mann, who has been with the Amodeis since they decamped from OpenAI in 2020, is the overlooked eighth.”
- Origin of Mann: The mystery of Anthropic’s 8th cofounder San Francisco Standard · 26 October 2026
“Mann helped develop GPT-3 at OpenAI, left in 2021, decamping with seven others who went on to found Anthropic.”
- Leadership at Anthropic Anthropic · 4 November 2026 Own record
“Daniela Amodei co-founded Anthropic and serves as chair of its Board of Directors.”
Reasoning
E1 says Anthropic was founded by seven former OpenAI employees, including Daniela and Dario Amodei, which matches the claim. E2 agrees that the founding team is usually described as seven people. E2 and E3 also report that Benjamin Mann left OpenAI with this group, describing him as an overlooked eighth founder who 'decamped with seven others'. That makes the claim that only seven people originally left somewhat imprecise, but the recognized group of co-founders is still seven.
Cite this claim
Daniela Amodei, “Seven people originally left OpenAI to found Anthropic: Daniela and Dario Amodei and five co-founders.” (said 29 June 2026). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_adbc581385ae, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_adbc581385ae
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Daniela Amodei? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.