Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
83 78 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 83 (likely 78 to 88, high confidence), from 86 claims: 86 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Daniela Amodei's claims
150 claims · page 2 of 2
“the boiler plate vision or mission that you would see if you looked on our website is that we're building steerable, interpretable and reliable AI systems”
Daniela Amodei, Anthropic co-founder, interviewed 4 March 2022 Daniela and Dario Amodei on Anthropic (Future of Life Institute)
Anthropic's website states its mission as building steerable, interpretable and reliable AI systems.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2022-03-04. True if Anthropic's website at or around that date (e.g. homepage or about page) described its mission or vision as building steerable, interpretable and reliable AI systems, in those or essentially equivalent words. Mostly true if the website used the three qualities with minor wording differences (e.g. a different order, 'AI safety and research company that builds reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems'). Mixed if the website stated only some of the three qualities as the mission. Mostly false if the phrase appeared on the site only incidentally and not as a mission or vision statement, or if it appeared only well before or after the date. False if the website's stated mission at that time was materially different and did not include these qualities.
Evidence
- Anthropic raises $124 million Series A Anthropic · 28 May 2021 Own record
“Anthropic will use the funding for computationally-intensive research to develop large-scale AI systems that are steerable, interpretable, and robust.”
- Anthropic raises $124 million Series A Anthropic · 28 May 2021 Own record
“The financing round will support Anthropic in executing against its research roadmap and building prototypes of reliable and steerable AI systems.”
- Anthropic raises Series B to build robust AI Anthropic · 29 April 2022 Own record
“Since its founding at the beginning of 2021, Anthropic has conducted research into making systems that are more steerable, robust, and interpretable.”
- Anthropic - Wikipedia Wikipedia
“According to Anthropic, its goal is to research AI systems' safety and reliability.”
- Anthropic's core views on AI safety Anthropic · 8 March 2023 Own record
“First, it may be tricky to build safe, reliable, and steerable systems when those systems are starting to become as intelligent and as aware of their surroundings as their designers.”
- Anthropic - Wikipedia Wikipedia
“In January 2021, with the goal of promoting AI safety, Anthropic was founded by former members of OpenAI, including siblings Daniela Amodei and Dario Amodei, who are president and CEO, respectively.”
- Company Anthropic · 7 October 2026 Own record
“We aim to build frontier AI systems that are reliable, interpretable, and steerable. We conduct research, develop safety techniques, and deploy the resulting systems through our partnerships and products.”
- Home Anthropic · 22 September 2026 Own record
“Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.”
- Anthropic · AI Entrepreneurship Wiki AI Entrepreneurship Wiki · 16 June 2026
“Its Series A announcement said the funding would support computationally-intensive research to develop large-scale AI systems that are steerable, interpretable, and robust, and named Dario Amodei as chief executive and Daniela Amodei as president”
- Anthropic Vivarium wiki (vivarium.sh) · 24 July 2026
“Anthropic's company page describes it as "an AI safety and research company" that builds "reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems,"”
Reasoning
No evidence shows Anthropic's homepage or about page as it stood around 2022-03-04. E1 (May 2021) and E3 (April 2022) are news posts on Anthropic's site. E1 and E3 describe research or funding goals using steerable, interpretable and robust, and the same May 2021 post also refers to reliable and steerable AI systems (E2); none of these presents the wording as the site's mission statement. E7 and E8 show the 'reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems' wording on the homepage and company page in 2026, so they cannot establish what the site said at the judged date.
Cite this claim
Daniela Amodei, “Anthropic's website states its mission as building steerable, interpretable and reliable AI systems.” (said 4 March 2022). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_6b772beeaa9e, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6b772beeaa9e
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Daniela Amodei? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.