For Panasonic's domestic battery manufacturing, Tesla and Panasonic are splitting the value of the credits.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
The Tesla–Panasonic credit-sharing arrangement is a private contract, though Panasonic has commented publicly.
Cite this claim
Elon Musk, “For Panasonic's domestic battery manufacturing, Tesla and Panasonic are splitting the value of the credits.” (said 26 January 2023). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_f7efdc3048c5, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f7efdc3048c5
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Elon Musk
-
Resolved true
“there's a roadmap, actually for Tesla, literally.”
-
Mostly false
“We obviously have cars operating with no one in them and no safety monitor and no follow car or anything like that in Austin right now.”
-
Resolved true
“So I have updated the Tesla, Inc. mission to amazing abundance, and this is intended to send a message of optimism about the future.”
-
Mostly false
“𝕏 is the number 1 source of news on Earth.”
-
Mostly false
“Remember when almost every legacy media outlet lied that Biden was “sharp as a tack” right before the Presidential debate where it was obvious he had dementia?”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.