Amodei said he thinks OpenAI has generally been very selective in whom it picks.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
"Very selective" is vague and has no clear test.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Amodei said he thinks OpenAI has generally been very selective in whom it picks.” (said 21 July 2017). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_f4e58853633c, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f4e58853633c
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Resolved true
“I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.”
-
Resolved true
“Today I'm publishing a new essay, Policy on the AI Exponential.”
On 2026-06-10 Dario Amodei published a new essay titled Policy on the AI Exponential.
-
Mostly true
“I have worked on AI for the last twelve years because I believe it could dramatically raise the quality of human life.”
-
Mostly true
“Which I think had real commercial consequences, but set the culture of the company”
Amodei said he thinks delaying Claude's release had real commercial consequences for Anthropic.
-
Mostly true
“When we founded Anthropic, we decided to make it a central part of the new company’s direction”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.