The models Anthropic has released so far were not that expensive to train.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
'Not that expensive' is vague and training costs are not published in a way that tests it.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “The models Anthropic has released so far were not that expensive to train.” (said 28 February 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_e104e541d377, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_e104e541d377
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Resolved true
“I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.”
-
Resolved true
“Today I'm publishing a new essay, Policy on the AI Exponential.”
On 2026-06-10 Dario Amodei published a new essay titled Policy on the AI Exponential.
-
Mostly true
“I have worked on AI for the last twelve years because I believe it could dramatically raise the quality of human life.”
-
Mostly true
“Which I think had real commercial consequences, but set the culture of the company”
Amodei said he thinks delaying Claude's release had real commercial consequences for Anthropic.
-
Mostly true
“When we founded Anthropic, we decided to make it a central part of the new company’s direction”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.