ClaimsNassim Taleb

“The Netherlands have a policy of building and calibrating their dams and dykes not on the average height of the sea level, but on the extremes”

Taleb, co-author of the paper July 2020 On Single Point Forecasts for Fat-Tailed Variables (arXiv) archived copy

Factual Other global risks

The Netherlands builds and calibrates its dams and dykes on extreme sea levels, including those estimated by modelling the tail with extreme value theory, not on average sea level.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

True: official Dutch flood-protection policy (for example, the Delta Programme, the Water Act or Rijkswaterstaat safety standards) sets design standards for dikes and dams by extreme water levels or exceedance probabilities (such as 1-in-10,000-year levels or flood-probability standards), not by average sea level, and extreme-value or tail statistics are used to estimate those levels. Mostly true: design is based on extreme levels or exceedance probabilities, but the use of extreme value theory specifically is minor, indirect or not documented. Mixed: extremes are used for some flood defences, while a substantial share are designed on other bases. Mostly false: extremes play only a secondary role and the main design basis is something else. False: Dutch policy designs dikes on average sea level, or does not use extreme levels at all.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 An ensemble study of extreme storm surge related water levels in the North Sea in a changing climate Ocean Science (Copernicus Publications), by A. Sterl et al., KNMI · 18 September 2009

    “To determine the 10 000-year return surge height, simulated and observed annual maxima, y, are fitted to a Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution, the theoretical distribution for block maxima (Coles, 2001),”
  2. E2 An ensemble study of extreme storm surge related water levels in the North Sea in a changing climate Ocean Science (Copernicus Publications), by A. Sterl et al., KNMI · 18 September 2009

    “By law, part of the coastal defence system has to withstand a water level that on average occurs only once every 10 000 years.”
  3. E3 Risk and coastal zone policy: example from the Netherlands Coastal Wiki · 22 February 2025

    “The design water level of flood defences along the dutch coast are designed using the probabilistic approach. These levels are related to extreme storm surge water levels with a certain probability of occurrence.”
  4. E4 WBI2017 Code calibration : reliability-based code calibration and semi-probabilistic assessment rules for the WBI2017 Rijkswaterstaat (Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu) / Deltares, by R. Jongejan · 24 June 2017

    “In the past, the standards were defined in terms of exceedance probabilities of loads that primary flood defenses should be able to safely withstand.”

Reasoning

E2 says Dutch law requires part of the coastal defence system to withstand a water level that occurs on average once every 10,000 years. E4 (Rijkswaterstaat/Deltares) says flood-defence standards were defined as exceedance probabilities of loads, and E3 says design water levels along the coast are set with a probabilistic approach tied to extreme storm surges. E1 (KNMI) shows the 10,000-year return surge height is estimated by fitting annual maxima to a Generalized Extreme Value distribution, which is extreme-value theory. Together these show that design rests on extreme levels and exceedance probabilities, not on average sea level, and that tail statistics are used to estimate those levels.

Cite this claim

Nassim Taleb, “The Netherlands builds and calibrates its dams and dykes on extreme sea levels, including those estimated by modelling the tail with extreme value theory, not on average sea level.” (said July 2020). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_df3ecdda57ea, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_df3ecdda57ea

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Nassim Taleb, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Nassim Taleb

  1. Resolved true Factual 18 May 2015
    “given that potential war casualties are bounded by the world population”

    Potential war casualties are bounded by the world population.

  2. Mostly false Factual 28 September 2025
    “The Levant was the most stable area in the world between early 1800s and 1948, with squirmishes in 1860.”

    The Levant was the most stable area in the world between the early 1800s and 1948, with only skirmishes in 1860.

  3. Mixed Factual 25 September 2025
    “My point was that bike lanes contribute to IMPROVEMENT in well-being and happiness WITHOUT generating economic growth.”

    Taleb's point was that bike lanes improve well-being and happiness without generating economic growth.

  4. Mixed Factual 24 September 2025
    “entities grow in a convex way, then slow as they saturate — growth may be unbounded, but remains sub-logarithmic.”

    Entities in biology and economics grow convexly then slow as they saturate; growth may be unbounded but remains sub-logarithmic.

  5. Mixed Factual 24 September 2025
    “the unavoidable conclusion is that cardio problems are at least half genetic.”

    If ancient populations such as hunter-gatherers and Inuit had a high incidence of cardiovascular disease, the unavoidable conclusion is that cardiovascular problems are at least half genetic.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.