Asked by Tucker Carlson whether "it" would be legal to do, Sam Altman said he did not think it was legal.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Cite this claim
Sam Altman, “Asked by Tucker Carlson whether "it" would be legal to do, Sam Altman said he did not think it was legal.” (said 11 September 2025). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_cbf4cf99ad0f, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_cbf4cf99ad0f
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Sam Altman
-
Resolved true
“And right now, we don’t have that.”
-
Resolved true
“We share your concern about bias and safety in language models, and it's a big part of why we're starting off with a beta and have safety review before apps can go live.”
-
Mostly true
“The very end of 2015, we announced it, and then the first day of work was like January of 2016.”
-
Mostly true
“not until 2020 did we train GPT-3, which was the first model that I think actually was over some threshold of usability.”
OpenAI trained GPT-3 in 2020, which Altman considers the first model above a threshold of usability.
-
Mostly true
“Absolutely. To go back to the analogy of electricity, there’s this amazing chart of what it cost to have an hour of light at night.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.