ClaimsDario Amodei

“例如,我们训练的 Claude 3 Opus 模型在进行 20 位数字加法时,基本上可以达到 99.9% 的准确率,而这一性能远超互联网上的常见数据。”

Dario Amodei, Anthropic CEO, interviewee 12 April 2024 Transcript: Ezra Klein Interviews Dario Amodei (translation) (baoyu.io) archived copy

Factual AI capabilities

Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus reaches roughly 99.9% accuracy on 20-digit addition, well beyond what common internet data would give.

Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.

What would count as true or false

Judge as of 2024-04-12; the claim is hedged ('basically', 'roughly'). True: an Anthropic publication or credible evaluation available by that date shows Claude 3 Opus at about 99.9% accuracy (≥ about 99.5%) on 20-digit addition, and that this is beyond what memorizing common internet data would explain. Mostly true: documented accuracy is very high but somewhat below the figure (about 98–99.5%), or the result is documented but under slightly different conditions (e.g. a different number of digits close to 20). Mixed: high accuracy is documented, but well below 99.9% (about 90–98%), or the evaluation conditions differ materially. Mostly false: there is only anecdotal or unpublished support, or evidence of much lower accuracy, but some real arithmetic ability. False: credible evaluations from that time show Claude 3 Opus clearly failing at 20-digit addition (e.g. below 80% accuracy). If no published measurement exists at all, the claim is unresolvable rather than false.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (6)

  1. E1 Right to Left (R2L) Integer Tokenization beren.io (guest post by Max Buckley, software engineer at Google) · 7 July 2024

    “| Supplier | Model | Default Performance | Default Strategy | Forced R2L 3 digit (With Commas) | Improvement | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Anthropic | claude-2.1 | 0.3 | BPE | 72.7 | 72.4 | | OpenAI | gpt-3.5-turbo | 35.3 | L2R 3 digit | 85 | 49.7 | | OpenAI | gpt-4o | 89.7 | L2R 3 digit | 96.3 | 6.6 | | Anthropic | claude-3-haiku-20240307 | 94.3 | R2L 3 digit | - | -”
  2. E2 Right to Left (R2L) Integer Tokenization beren.io (guest post by Max Buckley, software engineer at Google) · 7 July 2024

    “As it turns out, one of the improvements made in the Claude 3 series is the change to R2L number tokenization. With this change in place Claude 3 and beyond have far superior arithmetic capabilities.”
  3. E3 States Hidden in Hidden States: Implicit Discrete State Representations Emerge in LLMs’ Hidden States arXiv (Tsinghua University authors: Junhao Chen, Shengding Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun) · 31 July 2024

    “We exclude addition involving four-digit or more due to its increased single-step complexity, which complicates tracing implicit computation because of single-step errors.”
  4. E4 Right to Left (R2L) Integer Tokenization beren.io (guest post by Max Buckley, software engineer at Google) · 7 July 2024

    “allowing it to learn simple serial algorithms for performing arithmetic operations instead of a vast and arbitrary lookup table.”
  5. E5 States Hidden in Hidden States: Implicit Discrete State Representations Emerge in LLMs' Hidden States arXiv (authors from Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University)

    “Specifically, we evaluate the exact accuracy of the predicted answers against the ground truth for different models directly performing iterative addition of varying lengths from 2 to 14.”
  6. E6 States Hidden in Hidden States: Implicit Discrete State Representations Emerge in LLMs' Hidden States arXiv (authors from Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University)

    “It is evident that larger and more advanced closed-source models exhibit higher accuracies emergently.”

Reasoning

None of the evidence gives a published accuracy figure for Claude 3 Opus on 20-digit addition, and none of it dates from on or before 2024-04-12. E1's table lists Claude 3 Haiku and other models, not Opus, and its quote does not say what task or digit length the figures measure. E2 and E4 only say in general terms that Claude 3's arithmetic improved after a tokenization change. E3, E5 and E6 cover iterative addition of other lengths and exclude 20-digit operands. Without a published measurement, the criteria call for a verdict of unresolvable.

Cite this claim

Dario Amodei, “Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus reaches roughly 99.9% accuracy on 20-digit addition, well beyond what common internet data would give.” (said 12 April 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_bc6f2678b6f3, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_bc6f2678b6f3

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Dario Amodei, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Dario Amodei

  1. Mixed Factual 23 September 2026
    “It’s easy to dismiss this as a one-off or curiosity, but we’ve repeatedly seen a pattern where AI performance in new intellectual domains goes from weak to superhuman in a matter of a few years.”

    AI performance in new intellectual domains has repeatedly gone from weak to superhuman within a few years.

  2. Mixed Factual 10 March 2025
    “we were measuring these trends back when models cost $1,000 or $10,000 to train”

    Amodei's group measured AI scaling trends when models cost $1,000 or $10,000 to train.

  3. Mixed Factual 28 February 2025
    “a lot of the other reasoning models in the market are trained primarily on math and competition coding,”

    Many other companies' reasoning models on the market are trained primarily on math and competition coding.

  4. Mostly true Factual 28 February 2025
    “I do think AI coding is moving the fastest of all the other areas.”

    Amodei said he thinks AI coding is moving the fastest of all the areas of AI.

  5. Mostly true Factual 28 February 2025
    “Because when it knows that it doesn't get any gain out of thinking further, it doesn't think for longer.”

    The model sometimes gives a very short response because, when it knows it gains nothing from thinking further, it does not think for longer; a bound on how long it thinks is still described as valuable.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.