Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus reaches roughly 99.9% accuracy on 20-digit addition, well beyond what common internet data would give.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2024-04-12; the claim is hedged ('basically', 'roughly'). True: an Anthropic publication or credible evaluation available by that date shows Claude 3 Opus at about 99.9% accuracy (≥ about 99.5%) on 20-digit addition, and that this is beyond what memorizing common internet data would explain. Mostly true: documented accuracy is very high but somewhat below the figure (about 98–99.5%), or the result is documented but under slightly different conditions (e.g. a different number of digits close to 20). Mixed: high accuracy is documented, but well below 99.9% (about 90–98%), or the evaluation conditions differ materially. Mostly false: there is only anecdotal or unpublished support, or evidence of much lower accuracy, but some real arithmetic ability. False: credible evaluations from that time show Claude 3 Opus clearly failing at 20-digit addition (e.g. below 80% accuracy). If no published measurement exists at all, the claim is unresolvable rather than false.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (6)
-
E1 Right to Left (R2L) Integer Tokenization beren.io (guest post by Max Buckley, software engineer at Google) · 7 July 2024
“| Supplier | Model | Default Performance | Default Strategy | Forced R2L 3 digit (With Commas) | Improvement | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Anthropic | claude-2.1 | 0.3 | BPE | 72.7 | 72.4 | | OpenAI | gpt-3.5-turbo | 35.3 | L2R 3 digit | 85 | 49.7 | | OpenAI | gpt-4o | 89.7 | L2R 3 digit | 96.3 | 6.6 | | Anthropic | claude-3-haiku-20240307 | 94.3 | R2L 3 digit | - | -”
-
E2 Right to Left (R2L) Integer Tokenization beren.io (guest post by Max Buckley, software engineer at Google) · 7 July 2024
“As it turns out, one of the improvements made in the Claude 3 series is the change to R2L number tokenization. With this change in place Claude 3 and beyond have far superior arithmetic capabilities.”
-
E3 States Hidden in Hidden States: Implicit Discrete State Representations Emerge in LLMs’ Hidden States arXiv (Tsinghua University authors: Junhao Chen, Shengding Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun) · 31 July 2024
“We exclude addition involving four-digit or more due to its increased single-step complexity, which complicates tracing implicit computation because of single-step errors.”
-
E4 Right to Left (R2L) Integer Tokenization beren.io (guest post by Max Buckley, software engineer at Google) · 7 July 2024
“allowing it to learn simple serial algorithms for performing arithmetic operations instead of a vast and arbitrary lookup table.”
-
E5 States Hidden in Hidden States: Implicit Discrete State Representations Emerge in LLMs' Hidden States arXiv (authors from Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University)
“Specifically, we evaluate the exact accuracy of the predicted answers against the ground truth for different models directly performing iterative addition of varying lengths from 2 to 14.”
-
E6 States Hidden in Hidden States: Implicit Discrete State Representations Emerge in LLMs' Hidden States arXiv (authors from Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University)
“It is evident that larger and more advanced closed-source models exhibit higher accuracies emergently.”
Reasoning
None of the evidence gives a published accuracy figure for Claude 3 Opus on 20-digit addition, and none of it dates from on or before 2024-04-12. E1's table lists Claude 3 Haiku and other models, not Opus, and its quote does not say what task or digit length the figures measure. E2 and E4 only say in general terms that Claude 3's arithmetic improved after a tokenization change. E3, E5 and E6 cover iterative addition of other lengths and exclude 20-digit operands. Without a published measurement, the criteria call for a verdict of unresolvable.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus reaches roughly 99.9% accuracy on 20-digit addition, well beyond what common internet data would give.” (said 12 April 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_bc6f2678b6f3, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_bc6f2678b6f3
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mixed
“It’s easy to dismiss this as a one-off or curiosity, but we’ve repeatedly seen a pattern where AI performance in new intellectual domains goes from weak to superhuman in a matter of a few years.”
-
Mixed
“we were measuring these trends back when models cost $1,000 or $10,000 to train”
Amodei's group measured AI scaling trends when models cost $1,000 or $10,000 to train.
-
Mixed
“a lot of the other reasoning models in the market are trained primarily on math and competition coding,”
-
Mostly true
“I do think AI coding is moving the fastest of all the other areas.”
Amodei said he thinks AI coding is moving the fastest of all the areas of AI.
-
Mostly true
“Because when it knows that it doesn't get any gain out of thinking further, it doesn't think for longer.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.