Blue Ocean Re was set up in late 2005 to take advantage of what Burry called an extraordinary pricing ability in the retrocessional reinsurance space.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Test: Blue Ocean Re was established in late 2005 (roughly September to December 2005) to exploit unusually attractive pricing in the retrocessional reinsurance market. - True: incorporation or registration records, press reports or Scion/Blue Ocean documents show the company was formed in late 2005 as a retrocessional reinsurance vehicle aimed at the high post-hurricane pricing. - Mostly true: the purpose matches, but formation dates to a nearby period (e.g., mid-2005 or early 2006), or the business line is described as reinsurance more broadly with a retrocession focus. - Mixed: either the timing or the purpose is substantially wrong, but not both. - Mostly false: such a vehicle existed but was formed well outside 2005, or for a materially different purpose. - False: Blue Ocean Re did not exist as described, or was not set up as a reinsurance vehicle.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Five more class four insurers licensed The Royal Gazette (Bermuda) · 7 December 2005
“And Montpelier Re, another Bermuda insurance and reinsurance company, also last month formed Blue Ocean Reinsurance Ltd.”
-
E2 RenRe launches $60m sidecar to boost its Florida homeowners' capacity The Royal Gazette (Bermuda), reprinting AM Best via COMTEX · 2 June 2009
“Montpelier Re's sidecar Blue Ocean Re, formed at the end of 2005 to assume its Montpelier's retrocession book, did not take up new equity commitments that had been secured for 2007, according to Guy Carpenter & Co.”
-
E3 Growing Up Fast A.M. Best (Best's Review), by Meg Green
“Also, the company and other investors formed Blue Ocean Re in January 2006 with $300 million in capital, 57% of which came from outside investors.”
-
E4 0000950123-06-010266.txt - SEC.gov (Form 10-Q, Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd., quarter ended June 30, 2006) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (filed by Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.)
“Blue Ocean Re commenced underwriting business on January 1, 2006.”
Reasoning
A Royal Gazette report dated 7 December 2005 says Montpelier Re formed Blue Ocean Reinsurance Ltd. "last month", which puts its formation in November 2005 (E1). A later AM Best-sourced article describes Blue Ocean Re as formed at the end of 2005 to take on Montpelier's retrocession book (E2). Montpelier's SEC filing shows Blue Ocean Re began underwriting on January 1, 2006 [E4], and an A.M. Best article dates its formation to January 2006 [E3]. Most of the evidence supports late-2005 formation and a retrocession focus [E1][E2], though one source dates formation to January 2006 [E3], and none of the evidence says directly that it was set up to take advantage of unusually attractive pricing.
Cite this claim
Michael Burry, “Blue Ocean Re was set up in late 2005 to take advantage of what Burry called an extraordinary pricing ability in the retrocessional reinsurance space.” (said 2025). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_b60de9011e45, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b60de9011e45
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Michael Burry
-
Mostly true
“I have never said that LLMs would stop improving”
Michael Burry has never said that LLMs would stop improving.
-
Resolved true
“Why I swapped common stock for the junior preferred shares of Fannie Mae”
Michael Burry swapped common stock for junior preferred shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
-
Resolved true
“I never said the A100s would stop functioning.”
Michael Burry never said that A100 chips would stop functioning.
-
Mixed
“I have generally stayed away from biomed and medtech.”
Michael Burry has generally stayed away from investing in biomed and medtech.
-
Mostly true
“I am still running my money and active in markets.”
Michael Burry is still managing his own money and is active in markets.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.