The authors of the paper declare no competing financial interests.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Resolve against the competing-interests statement in the paper published 2015-05-27 (the Nature review 'Deep learning' by LeCun, Bengio and Hinton). True if the published paper, or any published correction, states that the authors declare no competing financial interests. Mostly true if the statement is worded slightly differently but still says there are no competing financial interests. Mostly false if the paper declares no competing interests but a published correction or erratum later adds some. False if the paper's declaration lists competing financial interests (for example, employment at Facebook or Google declared as a competing interest).
Set before the research began.
Reasoning
No evidence with a verified quote was found apart from the claim's own source, so the claim was not judged.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “The authors of the paper declare no competing financial interests.” (said 27 May 2015). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_a902eca1f5ca, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a902eca1f5ca
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly true
“The notions of partition functions, entropy, free energy, variational methods etc, that are so prevalent in the graphical models literature all come from statistical physics.”
-
Mostly true
“No one uses generalization bounds to do model selection.”
No one uses generalization bounds to do model selection; practitioners use cross-validation.
-
Resolved true
“The idea is rooted in Hubel and Wiesel’s classic 1962 work on the cat’s primary visual cortex.”
-
Resolved true
“This loss is always positive, since the second term is a lower bound on the first term.”
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.