Pershing Square estimates more than 70% of Otis' profits come from its service contracts.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
The claim is that Pershing Square made an estimate that more than 70% of Otis' profits came from service, and implicitly that the estimate is sound. True: Pershing Square's May 2018 materials (its United Technologies presentation or letter) contain the estimate, and the profit data available around 2018 (UTC segment disclosures, or the Otis Form 10/10-K that later gave separate New Equipment and Service operating profit for 2017–2018) show service accounting for more than 70% of Otis operating profit. Mostly true: the estimate was made, and the disclosed service share is just under 70% (about 65–70%) or depends on how corporate costs are allocated. Mixed: the estimate was made, but the disclosed data give a service share of about 55–65%. Mostly false: the estimate was made, but the disclosed service share is well below 55%. False: Pershing Square made no such estimate, or the data show service accounted for less than half of Otis profit.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Otis - operating by segment 2018-2023| Statista Statista · February 2024
“Otis Worldwide Corporation's operating profit from FY 2018 to FY 2023, by segment (in million U.S. dollars)”
-
E2 united technologies corporation U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (filed by United Technologies Corporation)
“Segment financial data for the years 2015 through 2017, including financial information about foreign and domestic operations and export sales, appears in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2017 Annual Report.”
-
E3 OTIS INVESTOR & ANALYST DAY Otis Worldwide Corporation (copy hosted on thezenofinvesting.com) · 2020
“New Equipment 20% Service 80%”
-
E4 OTIS INVESTOR & ANALYST DAY Otis Worldwide Corporation (copy hosted on thezenofinvesting.com) · 2020
“Service profit ~2.5x new equipment profit over product lifecycle”
Reasoning
None of the evidence is a Pershing Square document showing the May 2018 estimate was made. The 2020 Otis analyst-day deck shows a 'New Equipment 20% / Service 80%' split (E3), but the quote does not say what that split measures or for which period. It also gives a lifecycle ratio of about 2.5x (E4), which is not a share of operating profit. The Statista page (E1) shows no figures, and the UTC 10-K excerpt (E2) only points to segment data without giving a separate service figure for Otis, so the criteria cannot be applied.
Cite this claim
Bill Ackman, “Pershing Square estimates more than 70% of Otis' profits come from its service contracts.” (said 17 May 2018). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_a8acb4aece8a, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a8acb4aece8a
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Bill Ackman
-
Resolved false
“the average life of an S&P 500 CEO is probably, I don’t know, 4 years or 3 years, 3 and a half years or something like this.”
-
Mostly true
“SpaceX is near monopoly in terms of low-cost space launch.”
-
Resolved true
“We created it out of the bankruptcy of General Growth.”
Howard Hughes was created out of the bankruptcy of General Growth as a spinoff of its other assets.
-
Resolved true
“2 years later, we emerged from Chapter 11.”
General Growth emerged from Chapter 11 two years after Pershing Square's investment.
-
Resolved true
“The company’s got a 4 billion dollar market cap, and the goal is to build it into a trillion-dollar thing over time, compounding.”
Howard Hughes Holdings has a market capitalisation of about $4 billion.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.